Writing an RFC That Gets Approved: nominalization and formal register in an RFC
About this lesson
Nominalization and formal register are the grammar of this C1 English for IT lesson plan on writing an RFC.
- Grammar
- Nouns from verbs and adjectives (decide → decision), the preposition each noun takes (a reduction in, reliance on), There will be + noun, and when nouns hide who acts.
- Topic
- Writing an RFC at a fictional payments startup and getting it approved, with words such as get buy-in, sign off on and prior art.
- Activities
- An RFC to read, an AI-voiced edit of the first draft, self-checking drills, a Slack review chat and a wheel of pitches; for homework, students write two sections of their own RFC and record a pitch.
What's inside
Chapter 1Warm-up: proposals that went nowhere
Chapter 2Reading: RFC-017, payout retries
Chapter 3Listening: from chatty to concise
Chapter 4Grammar: nouns without the zombies
- Study the scheme: nominalization and formal registerGrammar schemeTry it
- Fill in the table: nouns and their prepositionsFill in the tableTry it
- Choose the correct option for the RFCChoose the optionUnlock
- Fill in the gaps: make the chatty sentences formalFill in the gapsUnlock
- Choose the correct answer: formal, plain or zombie?QuizUnlock
Chapter 5Speaking: pitch it, defend it
Chapter 6Homework: your own RFC
Vocabulary
10 words and phrases from the lesson, each with a picture and audio in edio.
+7 more with pictures and audio in the lessonMore words
- open question
- prior art
- strawman
- hand-wavy
- exponential backoff
- idempotency key
- dead-letter queue
Grammar: nominalization and formal register
Nominalization turns a verb or an adjective into a noun: decide becomes decision, available becomes availability. In an RFC, nouns keep the headings and the Summary concise, while verbs keep the steps clear about who does what. Learners use each style where it does its job, attach the right preposition to every noun and keep their words plain.
Nominalization: formal, not fancy
Nouns make headings and summaries concise. Verbs show who does what. A good RFC uses both.
From verb or adjective to noun
The nouns take endings such as -ion, -ure, -ance, -al and -ity: decision, failure, reliance, approval, reliability. Increase keeps its form. The verb's object follows the noun with of: the implementation of the scheduler.
| Verb / adjective | Noun | In an RFC |
|---|---|---|
| decide | decision | a decision on the retry limit |
| implement | implementation | the implementation of the scheduler |
| migrate | migration | the migration of old payouts to Ledger v2 |
| fail | failure | payout failures; the failure of a bank's API |
| rely on | reliance | our reliance on one bank partner |
| reduce | reduction | a reduction in support tickets |
| increase | increase (same form) | an increase in retry traffic |
| approve | approval | approval of (or for) the rollout plan |
| analyze | analysis | an analysis of last quarter's failures |
| available | availability | the availability of the bank's API |
| complex | complexity | the complexity of the retry logic |
| reliable | reliability | the reliability of payouts |
Which preposition comes after the noun?
Nouns of change take in for what changes and of for the amount: a decrease in latency, but a drop of 40 ms. Impact and reliance take on, need and demand take for, and risk takes of: a risk of duplicate payouts.
| After the noun | Nouns | Example |
|---|---|---|
| in | an increase, a reduction, a decrease, a drop | a decrease in latency (but of + the amount: a drop of 40 ms) |
| on | the impact, reliance, a decision (also about) | the impact on merchants; the impact of retries on the bank's API |
| for | the need, a demand | the need for manual review; a demand for faster payouts |
| of | a risk; most other nouns from verbs and adjectives (implementation, migration, availability…) | a risk of duplicate payouts; the availability of the API |
There will be + noun
A formal claim about a change can open with There will be, then the noun and its preposition: There will be a reduction in support tickets. There introduces the change, so avoid It will be a reduction in…
There will bea / an + nounpreposition + what changes
There will be a reduction in support tickets.
There will be an increase in retry traffic during outages.
Verb style or noun style?
Each style has its place. Slack, speech and steps want verbs: Latency will go down. Headings, summaries and formal claims want nouns: Automatic retries for failed payouts. A good RFC uses both styles, often in one section.
Verbs: Slack, speech, steps
- Latency will go down.
- We'll retry failed payouts automatically.
- We rely too much on one bank.
Nouns: headings, summaries, formal claims
- There will be a reduction in latency.
- Automatic retries for failed payouts
- Our reliance on one bank is a risk.
When nouns hurt: zombie nouns
A noun can hide the person who acts. A decision was made to pause the rollout never says who decided; Maya decided to pause the rollout does. Wherever readers need the doer, bring the verb back: Tom will implement the fix.
- A decision was made to pause the rollout.Who decided? Better: Maya **decided** to pause the rollout.
- The implementation of the fix will be done by Tom.Better: Tom **will implement** the fix.
- An analysis of the logs was carried out.Who did it? Better: Lena **analyzed** the logs.
Formal is not fancy
Formality comes from structure, such as headings, nouns and there will be, and not from rare words. Write use, not utilize; start, not commence; help, not facilitate; need, not necessitate.
Formal is not fancy
Formality comes from structure: headings, nouns, there will be. It does not come from rare words. Write use, not utilize; start, not commence; help, not facilitate; need, not necessitate.
Typical mistakes
a decrease of latency
a decrease in latency
in + what changes; of + the amount (a decrease of 40 ms).
the implementation the cache
the implementation of the cache
The verb's object needs of.
the payout retry failure email template
the email template for failed payout retries
Break long noun stacks with for, of or a verb.
We will utilize backoff to facilitate failure remediation.
We will use backoff to recover from temporary failures.
Plain words. Formal is not fancy.
Try the nominalization exercises
Try them yourself: these are the same exercises your students do in edio.
What's in the lesson
- 11 auto-checked exercises
- 3 games
- 2 teacher-checked tasks
- 1 article
- 1 grammar scheme
- 1 set of word cards
- 1 audio clip
- 1 picture
- 1 transcript
The main objectives of this lesson are to:
- turn verbs and adjectives into nouns for headings and summaries: reduce → a reduction in support tickets, complex → the complexity of the retry logic
- put the right preposition after each noun: an increase in retry traffic, the impact on merchants, the need for manual review, a risk of duplicate payouts
- spot a noun that hides the doer and bring the verb back: A decision was made to pause the rollout → Maya decided to pause the rollout
- write the Motivation and Proposal sections of an RFC and pitch it to leadership: This RFC proposes…
Lesson 9 of English for IT C1 · Across the Company closes the unit Security and design, whose writing covers advisories, trade-offs and RFCs. Lesson 5 turned phrasal verbs into nouns such as a rollout and a sign-off; this lesson does the same with verbs and adjectives, and lesson 10 opens the next unit with participle clauses. An RFC is a natural home for nouns, since leadership often reads no further than its Summary.
Students open boxes of questions about proposals and reviews, learn ten terms with pictures and audio, from get buy-in and strawman to idempotency key, and match them to situations. After matching RFC sections to their purpose, they read RFC-017 on payout retries and check it with true-or-false and multiple-choice questions. In an AI-voiced dialogue, Maya helps Rui cut the chatty sentences from his first draft. Four self-checking exercises follow the scheme, from a table of nouns with their prepositions to a quiz on formal, plain and zombie sentences. To speak, students answer Priya's review in a Slack chat, then spin a wheel to pitch a change or say a sentence formally.
Homework begins with two self-checking exercises: gaps that bring the verbs back and a memory match of RFC terms. Students then write the Motivation and Proposal sections of an RFC for a change they want at work and record a pitch for engineering leadership, both for the teacher to review.
- Grammar:
- nominalization · formal register · nouns with prepositions
- Topic:
- RFCs · technical writing · payments
Teaching tips
- Ask in-company groups to bring a real design doc: learners highlight every noun of change, check its preposition against the scheme and turn one zombie sentence back into a verb.
- Before the reading, hide the RFC's headings: pairs guess what Summary, Motivation, Risks and Rollout plan should each contain, then check with the matching exercise.
- Run a register relay: one team reads out a chatty Slack line, the other turns it into a Summary sentence with There will be or a noun and its preposition, then they swap.
- With one-to-one clients, draft a Summary for their own project: two sentences only, starting with This RFC proposes… and The main benefit is…, then compare it with their first version.
Liked it?
Teach the whole lesson in edio
22 exercises in 6 chapters, ready to teach. edio is an online platform for language schools and teachers: ready-made interactive lessons, live classes, homework and student progress in one place.
Start a free trial
7 days, no credit card.
Open the lesson
Find it in the library of 621 ready lessons. Teach it as it is, or copy any chapter into your own lessons.
Teach it live or as homework
Students work in their own accounts, in sync with you during the lesson, and the practice exercises check themselves.
The whole course: English for IT C1 · Across the Company
15 lessons at C1 for people who build software, in American English, with definitions instead of translations. The people of Kestrel Cloud, a fictional payments startup, write updates, reviews, RFCs and postmortems, explain tech to non-tech colleagues and negotiate scope. Real cases include the CrowdStrike outage and the xz backdoor.See the course
Unit 1 Talking to the team
async updates, code review and plain explanations: the future perfect, hedging, cleft sentences
Unit 2 Shipping and incidents
estimates, releases and outages: conditionals without if, phrasal verbs, modal perfects
Unit 3 Security and design
advisories, trade-offs and RFCs: passive reporting structures, concession and contrast, nominalization
Lesson 7Security Advisory: The xz BackdoorPassive reporting structures
Lesson 8System Design: Every Choice Has a CostConcession, contrast and modified comparatives
Lesson 9 · you're hereWriting an RFC That Gets ApprovedNominalization and formal register
Unit 4 Docs, metrics and meetings
READMEs, dashboards and follow-ups: participle clauses, describing trends, reporting verbs
Unit 5 Retros, interviews and AI
looking back and ahead: wish and would rather, inversion, formal obligation and permission











